It's a lovely piece, Marie. I guess it's a naughty girl journal. Fortunately, her "crimes" were long ago forgotten and the witnesses are no longer with us...
She's ascending the stairs to her cold and tattered attic rooms worrying what she will feed the children for supper. A lovely piece of pictorial narrative, Marie. Magnificent.
wonderful colors and layers!
ReplyDeleteThis is so beautifully "tattered," Marie! Gorgeous textures and monochromatic colors.
ReplyDeleteI really love what you've done for this theme, Marie. Your woman is gorgeous.
ReplyDeleteThis is one elegant piece of art. Wonderful use of tattered stuff, Marie. Very nice.
ReplyDeleteAnother tattered journal holding hidden secrets, beautiful sepia shades, Marie, superb presentation!
ReplyDeleteIt's a lovely piece, Marie. I guess it's a naughty girl journal. Fortunately, her "crimes" were long ago forgotten and the witnesses are no longer with us...
ReplyDeleteLove the bits of fabric and mixed elements here. One can only imagine the journal entries in this beautiful book!
ReplyDeleteI adore your tattered album Marie! An elegantly beautiful piece of work! xx
ReplyDeletewonderful composition!
ReplyDeletea beautiful tattered piece!
ReplyDeleteSo beautiful Marie!
ReplyDeleteI love it very much!
Wow. Who knew tattered memories could be so beautiful? Love the layering.
ReplyDeleteThis is such an elegant bit of tattered art, Marie. Beautifully done!!
ReplyDeleteLovely creation. Cheers
ReplyDeleteWow ! this is awesome ! I kove the corrugated cardboard.
ReplyDeleteShe's ascending the stairs to her cold and tattered attic rooms worrying what she will feed the children for supper. A lovely piece of pictorial narrative, Marie. Magnificent.
ReplyDeleteI love the brocade, and wish I could touch it! Very elegant!
ReplyDeleteThe lady looks either naughty or guilty :)
ReplyDeleteEither would suit for my journal :)
I love this! I love the whole look of it! A lady with a tattered past.
ReplyDeleteBTW, the URL you provided on the TAW message page was a bit tattered too. I think there was a typo in it. :-)